Voltaire is often quoted to have said "I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it." This is actually a misquote; he never said that at all. What he did say, though, was "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so." Close, but it's a pet peeve of mine when people get it wrong, like misquoting a movie.
I know a pet peeve of at least a few of my friends is the way I always seem so passé when people get all riled up about political arguments. They will often say things like “Why don’t you care more?” and “I can’t believe you’re not more pissed off about this!” The truth of the matter is that it’s not that I don’t care, it’s just that, well, Voltaire and I are kinda BFF. Maybe I’m just too good at putting myself in other peoples’ shoes – I see where they’re coming from, I understand their position, and as moronic and ignorant I might believe it to be, they have every right to believe it. I know I’ll never change their mind and a circular argument would ultimate break down into pointing out grammar mistakes and questioning one another’s sexual preferences. So I let it go.
But I can't do that when it comes to Park51 – the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque.”
First, let’s clear up one misconception: Park51 is not a Mosque, it’s a Muslim Community Center. Yes, it will be filled with Muslims and there will be room to say prayers, but there will also be art galleries, a gym, an auditorium, etc. An MCC is no more a Mosque than a JCC is a Synagogue, or a YMCA is a church. I think it’s important to note that there is a legit Mosque four blocks from Park51.
Putting the MCC near Ground Zero has been equated (by I forget who) with putting a Nazi memorial next to the Holocaust Museum. This is not correct. If anything, it’d be more like putting the German embassy next to the Israeli embassy, which still isn't really accurate. (For the record, the Israeli and Austrian embassies are separated by a scant 1000 feet.)
To be honest, the only argument I can find (and trust me, I’ve been looking) against Park51 is that that space is “hallowed ground,” being two blocks from the former site of the Twin Towers. So what exactly makes the place “hallowed?” Was it the devastation that occurred there on 9/11? Well, what about the Park East Synagogue? Never heard of it? It's just three blocks from Bernie Madoff’s former building. Granted, Bernie Madoff didn’t murder 2,000 innocent people, but he stole $65,000,000,000, effectively ruining countless innocent lives.
Even if the place is hallowed ground, what, exactly, is wrong with putting an MCC near it? What makes it so much different from anything else that’s been built without making headlines? The only response I’ve been able to find is that it’s insensitive to the victims and their families. But again, the question arises: what is so insensitive about it? Again, why is an MCC so different from whatever was in that building before? OK, let’s just stop beating around the bush – it’s that whole Muslim thing. You know it, I know it, we all know it.
Just say it out loud, “Muslims freak me out.” It’s ok, you’ll feel better afterward. The is the only way to make progress is to admit the problem. Once you admit that you are having trouble separating Islam from terrorism you can begin to learn the distinction between the two. (Note on the picture below: I found it online, but am 99% confident that I actually saw this truck when I lived in Virginia.)
The Park51 folks want nothing more than to build a religious community, a right that’s guaranteed to every person in this country by the First Amendment. Their religion does not harm you or this country in any way. When manipulated, distorted, and bastardized, it can, but you could say the same thing for anything. John Hinckley’s attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan was inspired by reading Catcher in the Rye. If you want to read it, go head, nobody's stopping you. I don't recommend it, though, because it totally sucks.
Imagine that a peaceful Christian community wants to build a YMCA in Baghdad. Now imagine that the news coming out of Baghdad is that supporters of the Y are receiving death threats - Iraqis are saying that constructing a Christian community center is nothing short of an insult on their houses, a huge loogie on the graves of their friends and family who have fallen at the hands of the Americans since March 2002 and they simply will not stand for it. Obviously, not all Americans are Christian (and not all Americans support the war, nor do all Christians, nor do all American Christians), so their anger is pretty displaced.
Imagine that someone in Yemen had a picture of the above truck stamped all over their car, with the caption "EVERYTHING I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT AMERICA, I LEARNED FROM THIS TRUCK." If you know that not all Americans are racist, bigoted assholes, then you can't assume that all Muslims are flag-burning terrorists. Q.E.D.
Now let's say, for the sake of argument, that one day in the future the president's policies aren't quite so friendly toward Muslims or predominantly Muslim countries. Would members of the Park 51 MCC have a right to be upset? Yes! Would they have a right to protest publicly? Aboslutely! Does that mean they love the United States of America any less than you and I? HELL NO! In my opinion, protesting against the government is one of the most patriotic things you can do. Democracy is built on the fact that people disagree and have the right to express their disagreements publicly; when you extinguish the voice of the people, you are left with Fascism at best, Totalitarianism at worst.
It’s generally agreed upon that the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII is a black eye on this country’s history. Out of an irrational fear of that which they did not have the fortitude to tolerate, grew a hate so strong that American citizens revoked from other American citizens the very inalienable rights they swore to protect: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This time, save the pitchforks for throwing out horse shit and the torches for illuminating darkness, so we can all live in a country where we can all believe whatever the hell we all want.
NOTE: I welcome rebuttals, as long as things stay civil. Leave them in the comments, or send me an email, the address is on the left module somewhere.
Mar 22 2012
50 minutes ago




16 comments:
I'm glad you posted this!
I 100% agree with you about tolerance. I don't always agree with what people are saying or believe, but I always respect them and hear them out.
It more then just the issue.
This post was well thought out, and hit every nail on the head. I couldn't agree more!
I LOVE this post! I hate it when people stereotype against a race/ethnicity/religion they don't agree with. Also, I love the way you have put this topic forward in your post!
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!! I agree that people are often annoyed at others when they choose not to be aggressive about their political beliefs. I have a friend who says "agree to disagree" in a tone of voice that really means "you're obviously wrong about this thing that really is an opinion but I'm treating it as fact" after attempting to start an argument for 20 minutes (I hope that huge run-on sentence made sense). The point is, people should respect others right to have a different opinion (and their right to teach others about their opinion). With that said, I think I'm a pretty open person, and can take change and suggestion to heart - but can someone please explain to me why it's okay to have several different degrees of fanaticism in Judaism and in Christianity, but not in Islam? And, if it is okay to have different degrees of fanaticism in Judaism and Christianity, why don't people protest against proposals like this that come from those *crazies* too?
Clearly you have a WAY more eloquent way of expressing your ideas - I just wanted to show my support for the "rant"!
I agree - I fail to see the logic behind protesting the 'MCC' beyond blatant and unnecessary hatred toward a religious group.
And it is not hallowed ground - Hallowed ground is a place where something miraculous occurred - think Moses and the burning bush, not where an atrocity was carried out. If anything having something that demonstrates the peaceful nature of most Muslims can only be a good positive symbol in such a place.
Oof. Where do I start?
Park51 is the whitewashed name for this. They changed it to Park51 because it's more vague and tolerable than the previous name, "Cordoba House", named for the Caliphate of Cordoba.
For argument's sage, let's call it the equivalent of building a German beer garden (for lack of a better German "rec center" equivalent) named the "3rd Reich House" two blocks from the ruins of a ghetto.
Right on, Brother!
Sorry, was caught up in the moment. I recently had a shit-storm hit my facebook because of this issue, and ended up having to cut ties with some old friends.
With you 100% (except for the Catcher in the Rye statement) :)
The hard part for me in this whole thing is that nobody seems to think this is a complicated topic at all. Everyone's all like "let's be clear about this blah blah" and "FACT CHECK" blah blah, but you know what, it's not that easy.
Why, in order to defend one position, is it necessary to completely negate and belittle the other position? I don't get it.
Yes there is a lot of fear in this country and some (or a lot) is based on racism. But not all of it is. The conversation has to be more nuanced than this. Maybe a lot of the people who are protesting Park51 are doing it out of racism and just blind hatred/fear of Muslims, and in that case it's not about THIS mosque/MCC (there is an actual mosque attached, read the Park51 website - it is a separate organization sharing the building) it's about ANY mosque/MCC. But there are those who are not opposed to them, who are opposed to the position of this one because of its proximity to a landmark of recent terrorism, in which case it's more about discussing locations and not about its existence. But that position is just thrown in with all of the others, and gets labeled racist, and is ignored.
I've heard people compared this to putting some kind of Japanese Cultural Center in Hawaii - but those do exist. They existed before the attack on Pearl Harbor and continue to exist. There were mosques near the WTC before 9/11 and one of them is still around (the other one closed, not sure why) though the space is inadequate. Park51, on their website, says its construction is in part to replace the space that was lost when the other mosque closed last year. The problem doesn't seem to be that there are/were mosques near the WTC, but that a big new one is being built. So now I wonder, and maybe need to do more research, when was the first new Japanese cultural center built in Hawaii after the attack? Could this reaction be an instance of "too soon"? And if it is "too soon," then when is the right time?
In conclusion, I feel like generally this has been blown completely out of proportion by our sensationalist media. Another blindly polarizing issue thanks to our friends at AP or wherever. Next, we'll revive the gun control debate (or will it be health care again?)
The hard part for me in this whole thing is that nobody seems to think this is a complicated topic at all. Why, in order to defend one position, is it necessary to completely negate and belittle the other position? I don't get it.
Yes a lot of the people who are protesting Park51 are doing it out of racism and just blind hatred/fear of Muslims, and in that case it's not about THIS mosque/MCC (there is an actual mosque attached, read the Park51 website - it is a separate organization sharing the building) it's about ANY mosque/MCC. But there are those who are not opposed to them, who are opposed to the position of this one because of its proximity to a landmark of recent terrorism, in which case it's more about discussing locations and not about its existence. But that position is just thrown in with all of the others, and gets labeled racist, and is ignored.
I've heard people compared this to putting some kind of Japanese Cultural Center in Hawaii - but those do exist. They existed before the attack on Pearl Harbor and continue to exist. There were mosques near the WTC before 9/11 and one of them is still around though the space is inadequate. Park51 says its construction is in part to replace the space that was lost when the other mosque closed last year. The problem doesn't seem to be that there are/were mosques near the WTC, but that a big new one is being built. So now I wonder: when was the first new Japanese cultural center built in Hawaii after the attack? Could this reaction be an instance of "too soon"? And if it is "too soon," then when is the right time?
In conclusion, I feel like generally this has been blown completely out of proportion by our sensationalist media. Another blindly polarizing issue thanks to our friends at AP or wherever. Next, we'll revive the gun control debate (or will it be health care again?)
sorry it posted my comment twice :(
BigCPA, the Caliphate of Cordoba was one of the most prosperous times for medieval Spain. True, the ruling Muslims often plundered Jewish and Christian towns, but the fact that they could somewhat secure their safety by paying off the government made it significantly safer for them than a lot of other places. Granted, that still doesn't paint them in the most positive light, but seriously... it was a thousand years ago.
Also, there are quite a few bars near concentration camps. There's one 600 feet from Dachau and one literally across the street from Auschwitz-Birkenau. In any case, a German beer garden is about as far from celebrating the Nazis as an MCC or mosque is from celebrating terror. Germans are not by definition Nazis, and Muslims are not by definition terrorists (or harbor any anti-American sentiment, for that matter).
JG, I read the website, but didn't see anything about a mosque sharing the building. Then again, I could have always missed it. In any case, by forcing a mosque/MCC to move because they're so close to a recent terror attack only reinforces the idea that we were attacked my Muslims, as opposed to terrorists.
As near as I can tell, the first official Japanese Cultural Center wasn't established in Hawaii until 1987, but (after some legal trouble) the first Shinto shrine reappeared permanently on October 29th, 1950.
And I agree that this whole thing has gotten blown way out of proportion and am fully aware of the fact that I'm really not helping anything. A lot of things have been blown way out of proportion throughout this administration. A white cop arresting a black professor on questionable terms results in some weaksauce "beer summit" at the friggin WHITE HOUSE?! give me a break
just want to point out the administration has not been the source of the ridiculous out of proportion reaction. the source has been, in fact, the media, that continues to refer to this project as "THE MOSQUE AT GROUND ZERO", despite all the documentation to the contrary. President Obama did make a statement that he fully supports the constitutional right to build park51, then backpedaled a bit about whether it was wise to do so.
BTW, it was Newt Gingrich that made the "Auchwitz" comment.
And there are Japanese Cultural Centers in HI, but none of them are directly across the street from or anywhere near the Arizona memorial.
I can understand why this project might make people uncomfortable, but letting it proceed is the right thing to do, and the American thing to do.
It wasn't all that long ago that Jews were regarded in the same suspicious light. Oh wait, that still happens...
putting people, beleifs, things etc under stereotypes is what has always led our human race to commit some pretty ugly crimes! and we have history books to proove it.
yet, somehow still today, we haven't managed to get tought by those previous mistakes and change our stereotypical attitude! and this is exactly the reason i question a person every time he sais he (or she) is open-minded. when on earth are we ever going to get over ourselves?
Well said! This is by far the best post I've read about this topic! I'm not muslim but you probably know how "sensitive" I am about racism/stereotyping. I love how passionate you are about this.
i agree with the comments saying it's not the Administration doing this, but the Media. they're making into a bigger thing than it should be. it really shouldn't have been more than a story run in the news for a day or two.
looking at that truck is all i need to know about that guy, yeah?
Agree. The world has become a scary place but I'm glad some people are still for tolerance.
Post a Comment